WSJ Contest – Friday, September 23, 2016

untimed (Evad) 


Patrick Berry’s Wall Street Journal contest crossword, “Backdrops”—Dave Sullivan’s write-up

WSJ Contest - 9/23/16 - "Backdrops"

WSJ Contest – 9/23/16 – “Backdrops”

Today, we have fairly specific instructions to narrow down our meta solution; namely, a theater employee. Let’s see, there are ushers, ticket-takers, directors, actors and actresses…will one of these be the answer we seek? Onward, my friends:

Theme answers are conveniently highlighted by having clues ending with question marks:

  • 19a. [Inferior movie segment?], LESSER – well something is obviously missing here, but what is it?
  • 20a. [Unnatural eateries?], STILTED – again the object of the adjective is nowhere in (plain) sight
  • 28a. [Elite squad convened?], A-TEAM
  • 32a. [“Calm down, buccaneer!”?], GET A GRIP – no one north of Tampa Bay would use the term “buccaneer” unless they had a good reason to avoid the term “pirate.” And looky here, the letters of PIRATE appear in the theme answer with two G’s left over. The game is afoot!
  • 34a. [Curbs the excesses of fame?], MODERATES – does STARDOM equate to fame?
  • 37a. [Gossipy conversation method?], CHIT CHAT, here the “backwards word” is TACTIC for method.
  • 51a. [Disparage Bordeaux wine?], CONDEMN, MEDOC was hard to see here.
  • 53a. [Steered clear of overhang?], EVADED – I like how my moniker “Evad” (Dave backwards) is also hidden in this word.

So the idea here is to complete the two-word theme phrases by removing the same letter twice and reading the word in the opposite direction. Reading those “dropped” letters in order from top-to-bottom, we have STAGEHAND, indeed not only a theater employee, but one who likely deals with backdrops on sets. Et voilà!

I loved the intricacy of this meta; this type of wordplay is classic Patrick Berry material. The idea is clever, the title is a clever way to describe what is going on, and the meta solution has a clever tie-in to the meta concept. It doesn’t get any better than this, folks. If I were to have any criticism, it’s that this meta is almost impossible not to stumble across, as it’s obvious that the theme entries as they appear in the grid are incomplete, and the clues are obvious enough to determine what word is missing. But this is a minor nit in the presence of a master at work.

So much theme material (how many other 15×15’s have 9 theme answers?) did force a few infelicities in the fill (ONE-STEP and YARNED protruding in the northeast seem to be the sorest of thumbs I see), but I did enjoy seeing my friend the LORAX in the grid as well as the timely entry ELECTOR, clued as [Member of a certain college]. See y’all next week!

This entry was posted in Contests and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to WSJ Contest – Friday, September 23, 2016

  1. JohnH says:

    This was great for someone like me who never really cared for “meta” puzzles. Maybe, too, that’s why I found the final answer easier than usual. Usually, that is, we’ve either an unthemed grid plus a theme answer, or a grid with theme answers plus a second, unrelated theme answer. Here the theme fill was interesting and challenging, and figuring it out was the key to the additional answer.

    I first ignored the extra words in theme clues. Maybe I was just missing the point and the clue would do. Then I puzzled over it. In due course, it was spotting letters from PIRATE in an answer and connecting it to the extra portion of the clue. From there, it was easy to look for more like it. Fun, too.

  2. Scott says:

    Loved this puzzle!

  3. Icdogg says:

    I won the mug!

  4. Icdogg says:

    Over 1000, it said

  5. I didn’t get the depth of this META.

    magnificent puzzle, shames all the rest of the month

Comments are closed.