WSJ Contest – September 22, 2017

untimed (Evad) 

 


Patrick Berry’s Wall Street Journal contest crossword, “Underdogs of Film”—Dave Sullivan’s write-up

WSJ Contest – 9/22/17 – “Underdogs of Film”

This week’s meta solution is a film about a team of underdogs. Other than the middle 13, it’s again not very clear what’s our thematic material in this one, as there are six 8’s in the across direction and two 9’s downward. Let’s look at that 13 first:

  • 37a. [Messianic figure to Rastafarians], HALLIE SELASSIE – hmmm, looks like a “dog of film” (I think of her more as a TV dog, but there were likely feature-length movies she starred in) ends this name, I wonder if there are other famous dogs scattered about?

“There’s no need to fear! Underdog is here!”

Indeed, there are two more:

  • 17a. [In direct confrontation], TOE TO TOE
  • 61a. [Beside oneself], IN A STATE

So what to do with these three dogs? Well, taking a hint from both the title and the meta solution we are looking for, let’s see what’s underneath each one. It reads:

THEL+ONGEST+YARD

And indeed, there is a 2005 film with that name, The Longest Yard, starring Adam Sandler about a team of inmates playing a football game against their prison guards. (I won’t spoil the ending for those who haven’t seen it.)

I found this meta pretty easy; in fact, I suspected the meta gimmick just from reading the title and confirmed it once I saw the central entry. Even with six theme entries in this one, Patrick managed to include some nice entries such as TURBOTAX, BLEW A FUSE and BIOHAZARD. I particularly liked the juxtaposition of RUBBER, IN LOVE and CRAVED in the southwest. I was a bit confused by the [Colorful tropical fish] as BETTA instead of “beta” as I’ve never seen this common aquarium fish’s name written out I guess and just spoken (and pronounced like “beta”).

This entry was posted in Contests and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to WSJ Contest – September 22, 2017

  1. Scott says:

    Excellent puzzle

  2. JohnH says:

    I’d trouble with the fill, but for once got the answer easily. That’s even though I don’t recall having heard of the movie, which sounds like a just awful play to formula.

  3. Sheik Yerbouti says:

    Note that the 2005 Adam Sandler movie is a remake of a (much better, IMHO) 1974 Burt Reynolds movie.

  4. Garrett says:

    Very clever how the meta answer is right there in front of you, as parts of other words. I also think the first movie was better

Comments are closed.