Wednesday, October 28, 2020

LAT 5:12 (Gareth) 


The New Yorker 5:32 (Rachel) 


NYT 5:43 (Amy) 


WSJ 5:47 (Jim P) 


Universal untimed (pannonica) 


AVCX 7:31 (Ben) 


Samuel A. Donaldson & Doug Peterson’s Wall Street Journal crossword, “Expect the Unexpected”—Jim P’s review

Let’s get this out of the way. At 4d, WET LOOK, is clued [Greaser’s style]. I have no problem with the entry, but that clue, though. Growing up in California, I’m used to hearing that word in a derogatory context. Every dictionary I just checked lists an offensive meaning, so I can’t fathom why it’s in this puzzle at all. Sure, there are other meanings, but nothing about that clue and answer tells me that it’s not using an ethnic stereotype. Further, there’s a synonymous offensive term also starting with “wet___”. I’m sure there’s a better clue out there.

Moving on. The theme today is not so much Halloweenish, but it is centered around the unexpected. I guess the idea is that Halloween is filled with surprises and so is this puzzle. (I know it’s a stretch; work with me here.)

Wall St Journal crossword solution · “Samuel A. Donaldson & Doug Peterson” · Constructor · Wed., 10.28.20

  • 17a. [Surprising, for a bricklayer?] OFF THE WALL
  • 28a. [Surprising, for an event planner?] UNCONVENTIONAL
  • 46a. [Surprising, to a baseball player?] OUT OF LEFT FIELD
  • 61a. [Surprising, to an optometrist?] EYE OPENING

Cute. I’m partial to the lively, idiomatic phrases, but UNCONVENTIONAL has its play on words going for it. Overall, a fun set.

The marquee Downs are CAPPUCCINO (don’t forget that second C), a Costco FREE SAMPLE, and FISHNET stockings. I also like SADLY, NO, but it was in yesterday’s grid, too. Talk about surprising.

New to me are Robinson CANO of the Mets and KOFI Kingston of WWE. I needed every crossing for each of them, but they were all fair enough.

One (other) clue of note: 3d. [Weimaraner warnings]. ARFS. These are big dogs. To me, ARFS are for little dogs.

Cute, fun puzzle, but one clue brought me down. Three stars.

Peter Gordon’s New York Times crossword—Amy’s write-up

NY Times crossword solution, 10 28 20, no. 1028

The theme is a 60-letter portion of a quote, which is a weird approach to take. It works okay given the teaser clue plopped at 1-Across: [With 21-, 30-, 49-, 61- and 74-Across, end of a Carrie Bradshaw quote that starts “Men in their 40s are like the New York Times Sunday crossword puzzle …”], TRICKY, / COMPLICATED, AND / YOU’RE NEVER / REALLY SURE / YOU GOT THE RIGHT / ANSWER. We can agree that the reductive approach of the Sex and the City writers isn’t really worth propagating, yes?

Outside of piecing together the TV line, there wasn’t much to love in the puzzle. A singular SUN DEVIL is all right, as are TRATTORIA and KVELLED. In the “ugh” category, there’s MIKE PENCE. Gross. In the “meh” category, we’ve got TSAR IMARET ARFS ETTU ETH and IANS, among other blah fill.

I know Peter strives to never repeat a clue, but I gotta say, cluing ICE AX as [Piolet, e.g.] is not right for a Wednesday NYT.

Three more things:

  • 72a. [Sue Monk ___, author of “The Secret Life of Bees”], KIDD. A gimme for me because my bestie lent me that novel years ago. I didn’t read it, but the author’s name is in my memory bank!
  • 35d. [It’s called “le jour J” in France], D-DAY. I did not know this tidbit. (Another “lemme write a fresh clue” clue.)
  • 18a. [Turkish inn], IMARET. Lololol, I bet Peter had some off-the-wall clue here that got edited out because you really can’t try to get cute when the answer is basically crosswordese. [Turkish inn] feels like it’s been used dozens of times for this entry, no?

My guys were watching the World Series game and the MLB commissioner came out to discuss the COVID-positive player pulled from the game (!), something along those lines—and none of us could remember the commish’s name. I Googled it—Rob Manfred. Which sent me straight to YouTube for some Manfred Mann music:

2.75 stars from me.

Aimee Lucido’s New Yorker crossword – Rachel’s writeup

I enjoyed this puzzle! It had a lovely grid design, a lot of entries I enjoyed, only a few things I didn’t, and is technically very impressive.  Quick writeup below:

The New Yorker crossword solution • Aimee Lucido • Wednesday, October 28, 2020

The grid is very pretty and also quite ambitious. The four long entries (LET THAT SINK IN / THIS IS AMERICA / ALL OF THE ABOVE / ADULT BEVERAGE) cross each other within the same 3×3 square in the middle, which I imagine was really hard to do without sacrificing too much fill. In fact, even finding four 13-letter entries that *could* cross like this probably took a lot of work and is super impressive and technical. That they are all *excellent* long entries makes this even more impressive (and if you haven’t seen it, definitely check out the video for the Childish Gambino’s THIS IS AMERICA. I also love a lot of the medium-length entries: IN A FUNK / TOE BEAN / BURRATA / I SAID SO / SIDE-EYE are all awesome, and even some of the short fill made me smile (specifically, it was fun to be reminded of the existence of TRL).

A few more things:

  • Fill I could live without but am fine having in this puzzle because of the impressive technical feat it accomplished: BIV, AS IT
  • RNR means something very different to academics, something I think a lot about
  • Not sure BE ONTO really works on its own
  • FEB [National Snack Food Mo.] – I can think of another National Month that occurs in FEB that is arguably of greater importance..!
  • Favorite clues: creature feature
    • [Feature on the underside of a cat’s paw, cutely] for TOE BEAN
    • [One of two, for a kangaroo] for UTERUS

Overall, tons of stars from me. Happy Wednesday! Vote!

Fred Piscop’s Universal crossword, “Unsound” — pannonica’s write-up

Universal • 10/28/20 • Wed • “Unsound” • Piscop • solution • 20201028

The theme is that the long answers start with words that can describe diminished sounds.

  • 17a. [What an inconspicuous person keeps] LOW PROFILE.
  • 10d. [Hot, twisty snack] SOFT PRETZEL.
  • 24d. [Something to “damn with”] FAINT PRAISE.
  • 55a. [One who wouldn’t hurt a fly] GENTLE SOUL.

That last one—gentle—doesn’t seem to work as well for me, but I can’t quite put my finger on why. Certainly—and pragmatically—they can all precede the word ‘sound’, furnishing approximately the same meaning. So I guess this is nevertheless a successful theme.

First thing I want to do now is get the big duplication out of the way: 14a [1836 siege site] ALAMO and 37d [Under attack from all sides] BESIEGED. I mean, c’mon.

  • 6a [Undesirable or desirable jeans features] RIPS. Fashion can indeed be weird.
  • 20a [ __ Schwab] LES. Ya, I don’t know who that is, and I’m not going to bother to look it up.
  • 23d [Many a tailless primate] APE. Barbary macaques are practically tailless, hence the common misnomer of ‘Barbary ape’. In fact (per Wikipedia), their tails are vestigial, measuring 4–22 mm.
  • 54a [Prefix with “trust” or “rust”] ANTI-. Have said it before, but I’ll say it again. I always appreciate when one of these types of clues brings another level in linking the example words. This time it’s that they’re just one letter off from each other.
  • 26d [Get fresh with] SASS. Interesting to see this crossword regular starting crossed entries, rather than as a crutch for a bunch of plurals.
  • 29d [Gray with age] HOARY. Time for some more zoology and some etymology! Here’s the hoary marmot, Marmota caligata. ‘Caligata’ is Latin for ‘booted’, a reference to their distinct black feet. But I notice in my little dictionary of word roots that calig-a is followed by caligin, which means ‘dark, obscure’. And that (plus the other word) puts me in mind of the the 1920 German Expressionist classic The Cabinet of Doctor Caligari and I wonder if that’s part of the rationale for the character’s name.
  • 46d [Southeast Asian capital] HANOI. Here’s a track Celestial Harmonies’ very excellent 3CD compilation of Vietnamese music (play it as loud as you like):

Becca Gorman’s AVCX, “Trail Mix” — Ben’s Review

AVCX 10/28 – “Trail Mix”

Today’s AVCX is a world debut by constructor Becca Gorman!  Congrats, Becca!

It took me two seconds of looking at the theme entries clues and thinking about the title of this week’s puzzle (“Trail Mix”) to spot what was going on:

  • 18A: 2000 ticket rebranded as strictly evidence-based from now on? [ha] — BYE HUNCHES
  • 27A: 1992 ticket rebranded to promise CRAZY DEALS on short-term apartments? — LOCO RENTING
  • 45A: 2020 ticket rebranded to emphasize that the candidates are really smart, and ready to work for you? — HIRED BRAINS
  • 56A: 1968 ticket rebranded to emphasize its support for letting everyone’s hair grow naturally? — WAXING NONE
  • 37A: Reboot when the race isn’t going well, or what is found in each of 18-, 27-, 45-, and 56-Across — CAMPAIGN SHAKEUP

This was a cute theme, even if I was not fully in the political headspace for it.  Each of these entries is the names on a political ticket (BIDEN HARRIS, for 45A, the most current campaign of the puzzle), anagrammed and reclued.  Elsewhere in the mix were BUSH CHENEY at 18A, CLINTON GORE at 27A, and NIXON AGNEW at 56A.

Elsewhere in the fill, this was pretty nice! I’m not sure how I feel about ENCRE being clued by “Ink for un tatouage” – the goal of the clue is to get me to write the French word for “ink” in the blanks of the puzzle, but something feels off about the word “Ink” being in the clue. OTOH, “tatouage” might not immediately jump out as being the French word for tattoo to all solvers. Le sigh.

Happy Wednesday!

Frank Virzi’s LA Times crossword – Gareth’s summary

LA Times

Today’s theme is a fairly standard, albeit vertical, “words with” theme. ACUTABOVE implies that the first word of four down answers fits the pattern “CUT ___” – CLASS, BACK, SHORT, and LOOSE. SHORT can actually take CUT both above and below, which confused me at first.

Tough fill for a basic theme:

  • [Princess loved by Hercules], IOLE. Pop culture made me want XENA… Which is wrong in several ways.
  • [Maine town on the Penobscot], ORONO. The official Maine town of crosswords.
  • [Tony Hillerman detective Jim], CHEE. Hope you didn’t try and overthink [Head of Cuba], CEE crossing it!
  • [Dark time in Pisa], NOTTE. Tough crossing with ORONO if you haven’t solved a ton of crosswords…

Playful clue(s):

  • [Little chicken tenders?], HENS. Would’ve worked without the little too though…


This entry was posted in Daily Puzzles and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to Wednesday, October 28, 2020

  1. pseudonym says:

    Hardest Wednesday in recent memory. Quotes puzzles are often tough and not so fun.

    • Zulema says:

      Very hard, I agree, but might still turn out to be on the fun side. Not done yet. but worse is the way the World Series looks like it’s going (for my taste).

    • Mutman says:

      Hard, unfun and abandoned. And after reading the solution, I’m glad I did so.

      I felt like most of the puzzle was bizarre clues with no way to know the (themed) crosses.

    • snappysammy says:

      yes, hard for wednesday, which makes it better for us, not so much for beginners

  2. Puzzled says:

    Re: Jim P’s WSJ “offensive term” comment

    I believe the word “greaser” was referring to “a rough young man, especially one who greases his hair back and is a member of a motorcycle gang” (definition from Oxford Languages) and not some “ethnic stereotype” as you suggested.

    • PJ Ward says:

      I was unaware it was also used as an epithet. When I saw it I immediately thought of James Dean. G*****ball is the disparaging ethnic stereotype I’ve heard of.

      • Margaret says:

        Showing my age, I immediately thought of the doo-wop band Sha Na Na. I note that their Wikipedia article contains this line: “The initial act had three up-front performers in gold lamé and the other nine in “greaser” attire (rolled up T-shirt sleeves, leather jackets, tank tops.)”
        I’m happy to retire the word now that I know it’s offensive! I always just thought of it as a 50s term, like the “greasers” in the movie Grease.

    • Sam Donaldson says:

      Yes, the clue referred to a subculture popular in the 1950s. And yes, I was unaware of the additional, derogatory meaning of the term. But none of that matters, because the clue is offensive. Hurtful words hurt, even when they aren’t intended to inflict pain. The clue was mine, I very much regret it, and I apologize. Lesson learned. I will be more careful going forward.

      • Billy Boy says:

        @Sam – take heart, it’s obvious you meant no harm

        however – GREASEBALL as an answer – Diesel powered train character for the musical (On roller skates) Starlight Express. AL-W, never had a chance for widespread exposure given the requirement to sing and roller-skate simultaneously limited the pool of performers just a wee bit, but it ran almost 20 years.

        Was quite the show with Original Cast in London, back in the 1980’s when it was much harder to know you’d offended someone.


  3. scrivener says:

    NYT: KVELLED crossing IMARET? I didn’t have a prayer. :(

  4. Ch says:

    Could someone please explain NYT 32D “Saw print” and 51D “Go (for)”? Neither RAN nor RETAIL is ringing a bell for me.

  5. David Roll says:

    WSJ published the same puzzle as yesterday–cut my solve time substantially.

  6. sanfranman59 says:

    NYT: Just imagine the uproar if the NYT used a stereotyping quote about a demographic group other than men in a puzzle.

    • sanfranman59 says:

      Terrible English there, but I’m guessing (hoping?) you get my drift. Suffice it to say that I recognize that “men in a puzzle” is not a demographic group.

    • R says:

      But then you’d have to imagine that this was part of a centuries-old pattern of targeting and disenfranchising and endangering men that reinforced that pattern as opposed to a dumb line from a dumb TV show that hurts literally no one, and who has the time for all that imagining?

      • Mutman says:

        So that makes it right, R? Great logic!

        • R says:

          As I said, since it hurts no one, it’s fine. I challenge you to find a single person who’s actually offended by this and isn’t just putting on a big phony crybaby show of reverse sexism. I won’t hold my breath.

          • sanfranman59 says:

            @R … If your point is that it’s okay to stereotype men in their 40s because they’ve not been subjected to centuries disenfranchisement, I completely disagree. I try very hard in my own life not to have preconceived notions about others based on gender, age, race, ethnicity, sexual preference, religion etc. My point is that this type of stereotyping serves no good purpose, no matter the target. I agree that this particular quote is relatively harmless, but so-called “reverse sexism” is sexism.

            “Big phony crybaby”? You had to go the name-calling route? To quote Socrates, “When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

  7. Luther says:

    WSJ Natick IVAN/CANO I’m more familiar with this
    Eddie Cano

  8. Judy Pozar says:

    I thought it was pretty cool that the (partial) quote could be split into six parts arranged symmetrically in the grid!

    Has anyone mentioned that this puzzle is 16, not the usual 15, squares wide? So if it took you a little longer than usual to solve, blame it on its bigger size.

Comments are closed.