Monday, August 23, 2021

BEQ tk (Matthew) 

 


LAT 1:52 (Stella) 

 


NYT 4:50 (Sophia) 

 


The New Yorker 4:57 (Amy) 

 


Universal untimed (pannonica) 

 


USA Today 5:11 (Darby) 

 


WSJ 4:39 (Jim P) 

 


Bruce Haight’s New York Times puzzle — Sophia’s recap

Theme: Each theme answer is the catchphrase of a famous television show.

New York Times, 08 23 2021, Bruce Haight

  • 18a [“Siskel & Ebert & the Movies” catchphrase] – TWO THUMBS UP
  • 25a [“Seinfeld” catchphrase] – NO SOUP FOR YOU
  • 39a [“Columbo” catchphrase] – JUST ONE MORE THING
  • 49a [“The Jackie Gleason Show” catchphrase] – HOW SWEET IT IS
  • 61a [“Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” catchphrase] – FINAL ANSWER

I spent a bit of time after solving this puzzle trying to figure out if there was another layer to this theme – did the TWO and the ONE (and the, uh, FOR…) add up to some FINAL ANSWER or something? But no, it’s just a set of symmetric catchphrases. I wish there had been some connecting thread, because otherwise, why these shows/catchphrases out of the thousands that have aired over the years? Just because they fit symmetrically? As a solver, the solution didn’t quite feel satisfying to me.

These catchphrases skewed quite old in terms of the ages of the shows – of the five, only “Millionaire” aired after the year 2000 (“Siskel & Ebert…” changed its name after Gene Siskel died in 1999). I like to think of myself as somewhat well-versed in pop culture history (I even took a TV history course in college), but the most I could tell you about some of these shows would be that… they existed? And that’s not to say that they aren’t good shows – it just means to me, as a 23 year old woman in 2021, they aren’t a part of my cultural conversation.

It’s always tricky to build an “easy” puzzle around specific knowledge, because every person’s idea of common knowledge is different. If you watched and loved all of these shows and were able to crush this puzzle because of it, that’s great! But for a lot of folks out there, this puzzle is nothing more than random phrases, which makes it much harder to solve. Thus, if you’re planning on making an easy puzzle around pop-culture trivia and having it appeal to a wide audience, it’s a good idea to include references and representation from different backgrounds and time periods. I personally think this puzzle could have done a better job of that.

That all being said! This puzzle had some strong highlights in the fill: GOOD GUESS, WOWZA, and WARIO were all fun. FCC isn’t a great answer but I enjoyed that it felt TV-theme adjacent today. I liked the casualness of I’M OUT and the interesting (if maybe a little too wordy) math fact clue for NINE. And I’d be remiss if I ended this post without a shoutout to my favorite NAT – my brother, who starts his sophomore year of college next weekend!

Fred Piscop’s Los Angeles Times crossword — Stella’s write-up

LAT 8/23/21 by Fred Piscop

LAT 8/23/21 by Fred Piscop

Here’s another sub-two-minute puz from the veteran Fred Piscop. Although this puzzle benefits from its revealer at 59D [Cry to one blocking your view at a concert … and a hint to the answers to starred clues], I can’t help feeling like the price of said revealer was one more themer, and I think there was probably a way to to make the theme work with four themers AND a revealer.

Anyway, said revealer is DOWN IN FRONT, and each theme phrase starts with a synonym for DOWN in its “sad” sense. We have:

  • 17A [*Hitchhiked] is BUMMED A RIDE.
  • 11D [*Something kept to avoid attention] is a LOW PROFILE.
  • 29D [*Dressing with Buffalo wings] is BLUE CHEESE.

There you have it: BUMMED, LOW, and BLUE are all synonyms for “sad” or DOWN. I appreciate that Fred was careful here to avoid using any of these words in their synonymous-with-DOWN sense in the theme phrases, so I guess as I armchair-construct this puzzle in my mind I realize it wouldn’t have been easy to come up with, say, a SAD phrase that would fulfill that requirement.

The fill was smooth, easy, and mostly unremarkable — although creating “mostly unremarkable” Monday fill is no easy feat. Are SCONES “biscuits,” though? Based on my unquestioned authority as an obsessive consumer of The Great British Baking Show, I would say no.

Erica Hsiung Wojcik’s Wall Street Journal crossword, “Joy to the Word”—Jim P’s review

I am traveling this week and visiting Glacier National Park, so I’m afraid my write-ups will be on the terse side. I apologize to this week’s constructors (especially newer ones) in advance.

The revealer is GET HAPPY (63a, [Song sung by Judy Garland in “Summer Stock,” and what the first halves of the starred answers can all do]). Each of the other themers starts with a word that can follow “happy.”

Wall St Journal crossword solution · “Joy to the Word” · Erica Hsiung Wojcik · Mon., 8.23.21

  • 16a. [*Nonverbal alternative to “How embarrassing!”] FACE PALM. Happy face.
  • 24a. [*Table protector under a plate] PLACEMAT. Happy place.
  • 38a. [*Best Western alternative] DAYS INN. Happy Days.
  • 51a. [*Beetle larva used in some science projects] MEAL WORM. Happy meal.

Ha! This was fun, wasn’t it? I didn’t realize there were that many phrases starting with “happy” but there’s also happy camper, happy hour, and happy medium. But I like this set just fine.

Nothing especially long in the fill, but SINATRA, TRY HARD, BRAINY, and ACRONYM are nice, although I would have laughed to see TRYHARD clued as a one word noun. Nothing to scowl at, so I’ll take it.

A happy start to the week 3.8 stars.

Gary Larson’s Universal crossword, “All at Sea” — pannonica’s write-up

Universal • 8/26/21 • Mon • Larson • “All at Sea” • solution • 20210823

Am back after a couple of days being sort of laid-up. Might take me a while to get my sea legs back, so I hope you’ll understand if I don’t go overboard as I embark on writing up this puzzle.

Today’s offering is phrases that could be—belay that—are reinterpreted as containing names of types of ships.

  • 16a. [Riverboat serving as a restaurant?] FOOD STEAMER.
  • 24a. [Vessel for exploring the depths of the Adriatic Sea?] ITALIAN SUB. (22d [Where to find a hero] DELI.)
  • 35a. [Large warship with no electrical system?] WIRELESS CARRIER.
  • 47a. [Passenger ship with built-in storage?] SHELF LINER. Not sure how well this one works for the clue. Or, rather, vice-versa.
  • 47a. [Speedy vessel that isn’t exactly waterproof?] PAPER CUTTER.

Okay, I’d say the theme holds water. Certainly wouldn’t call it junk.

Couldn’t find an interesting “ship of the desert” type song, but I will mention that that’s a common epithet for the CAMEL (7d [Caravan beast]). Intentional bonus?

Ballast fill:

  • More playful cluing than I would expect early in the week. I realize the Universal crosswords don’t progress the way the NYT puzzles do, but I still expect Monday offerings to be plain vanilla, smooth sailing. However: 5d [Natural bridge site?] NOSE, 13a [Word after “ham” or “AM”] RADIO, 64a [“Take that!”] BOO YA, 66a [“Simon __, fill in 66-Across!”] SAYS.
  • All right, perhaps those weren’t so atypical.
  • 11d [The Dog Star] SIRIUS. It was an important historical navigational aid for Polynesian peoples.
  • 30a [Comb stoppers] KNOTS. Maybe another nautical Easter egg? Hmm, even 32a [Got a cannon into position] for AIMED can be seen in a similar light.
  • 65a [Word on all U.S. coins] GOD. Dang, all of them? Tsk.

Time for me to shove off.

Malaika Handa’s USA Today puzzle — Darby’s review

Hi! This is Darby! Malaika not only created this awesome puzzle but she is on a much-deserved vacation, so I’ll be taking this and one other Monday USA Today! Happy to be here and to start off my week this way!

Theme: Every theme answer includes a bowling term at the end.

Theme Answers

Malaika Handa's "Bowled Over" solution for 8.23.2021

Malaika Handa’s “Bowled Over” solution for 8.23.2021

  • 20a [“Unauthorized action by unionized workers”] WILDCAT STRIKE
  • 35a [“Order at an ice cream parlor”] BANANA SPLIT
  • 51a [“‘Hurry!’”] NO TIME TO SPARE

This was a cute theme. It started off very serious, as I’d never heard the phrase WILDCAT STRIKE before (but as always, I was happy to learn). “Hurry” felt like a short clue for BANANA SPLIT, but I got it on the crosses pretty easily, especially once I had TIME and SPARE filled in.

I liked the shape of this one too, with the longer downs in the upper left and lower right corners. As I imagine most feel, I like getting my shorter words out of the way first (and could, to some extent, with the Acrosses), but I appreciated the stretch in filling in STOWS, POSITS, IT’S LIT (an LOL inducing answer), and, of course, NOODLE BAR.

Speaking of NOODLE BAR (4d [“Eatery with udon and soba”]), it formed one of four bastions of food-centric long clues in this puzzle that I loved. We also have 11d [“Advertising mascot with a top hat and monocle”] MR. PEANUT, 35d [“Drippings used to make gravy”] BACON FAT spinning off BANANA SPLIT, and 34d [“Ingredient in tacos al pastor”] PINEAPPLE.

Other clues I enjoyed included:

  • 14a [“Role for Scooter the Dog in ‘The Wiz Live!’”] – I’ve admitted never seen The Wiz, but it wasn’t a far jump when a dog was involved to figure out that he played TOTO.
  • 18a [“Instruction from a Hasbro toy”] – I already take enough breaks from my research and homework to do crossword puzzles (which could be for research, right?), so a BOP IT would only add to my procrastination.
  • 7d [“Feature of the last word in this CLUE”] – Honestly, I’m a sucker for wordplay like this that uses the text of the clue itself, especially when a puzzle acknowledges it has clues. It feels very fourth wall breaking to hinted at CAPS from the clue itself.

I’d say this puzzle was a strike, in bowling (not baseball) terms and appreciated the SPIN (1a [“Twirl”]) on the bowling theme.

Natan Last’s New Yorker crossword—Amy’s recap

New Yorker crossword solution, 8 23 21, Natan Last

Briefly, some notes.

Fave clue: 6d. [Has on record?], LAUGH TRACK. Yes, it’s bogus to pluralize an interjection like “ha,” but when it facilitates trickery like this, I’m all for it.

Did not know: 34a. [Poet and intellectual who was a founder of the Negritude movement], AIME CESAIRE. You can read a bit about Aimé Césaire and read a couple of his poems here.

10d SOME MORE is clued as [Seconds], and that fits, I’m just not sure I’ve seen SOME MORE in a grid before. Not sure how well it flies.

Four stars from me.

This entry was posted in Daily Puzzles and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Monday, August 23, 2021

  1. e.a. says:

    what a great review by Sophia

    • huda says:

      Agreed!
      I would add that, for these very reasons, the puzzle might work better on a Tuesday.

      • Me says:

        I agree. The constructor, Bruce Haight, notes in Wordplay that the editors wanted him to aim the puzzle for a Monday, but the final puzzle is only a Monday if you are of the right generation. Something like NOSOUPFORYOU or TWOTHUMBSUP would be pretty hard to get if you’ve never seen those shows. Tuesday seems better for this type of puzzle.

      • JohnH says:

        I wouldn’t go for that necessarily. For me, a quiz on pop culture is not the way to raise difficulty any day of the week, and it was a real weakness for me. But I didn’t have trouble coming up with a plausible phrase each time to fit the crossings.

        For the same reason, it sure wouldn’t help me if some of the quotes were more recent. But I do relate to Sophie’s fine review, especially her expecting ONE and TWO to lead somewhere else. When it didn’t, I reread the clues, thinking, oh, that. Well, ok at best.

    • Gary R says:

      I thought Sophia raised some interesting questions in her write-up.

      I was in elementary school in the 60’s, and Jackie Gleason was must-see TV for my parents – so that entry was a gimme for me (after I found that “And, away we go!” didn’t fit).

      I used to watch Siskel & Ebert occasionally during my college and grad school years, so that was also a gimme. But I honestly don’t know where younger solvers today could have become familiar with these. I’m sure you can find Gleason and S&E online, somewhere – but as far as I know, they’re not in syndication anywhere that younger folks would run into them without going looking for them.

      I only know answers to Simpsons and Game of Thrones clues by having seen them in crosswords. But I guess that’s on me – I can watch these shows if I want to.

      Makes me wonder when clues/answers about older classic movies – Casablanca, Citizen Kane, et al. – will become obsolete.

      • Mary says:

        I wondered the same thing about “Siskel & Ebert at the Movies” since Gene Siskel died more than 20 years ago, and I doubt the shows were ever rerun.

  2. Mark Abe says:

    NYT: I also tried and failed to find a deeper theme after getting TWO, NO, and ONE. My FINAL ANSWER was “meh”. I’m old enough to know all of these, but agree with Sophia’s comment that they skew too much in the last century.

    • John says:

      I loved Sophia’s review. I’m 64 year old man in 2021 and theme phrases are not part of my cultural conversation either. I knew them only because I grew up with them. The puzzle was stale and held no interest for me.

  3. Mr. Grumpy says:

    As a gentleman of a certain number of years, I loved today’s NYT, The rest of you get enough time for your rap stars and internet slang. Don’t begrudge us oldsters the occasional puzzle in our wheelhouse — or NO SOUP FOR YOU. :)

    • e.a. says:

      i fundamentally agree that you should have puzzles in your wheelhouse, and i will happily concede your point if you link me to a nyt puzzle, or week, or month, that had 4 rap stars as theme answers 🍲

    • Lois says:

      Thank you, Mr. Grumpy. I was so happy to see the constructor’s name, and the puzzle was a delightful break from keeping up with what’s new. That said, my wheelhouse is two decades behind this puzzle.

  4. stephen manion says:

    I am 72. Easy for me. Thoroughly enjoyed t. One of the catch lines from the Honeymooners was “To the moon, Alice.” “How sweet it is” came later. Jackie Gleason was extraordinary in The Hustler along with Paul Newman, George C. Scott and Piper Laurie. His effortless timing and grace was apparent throughout his career.

  5. lk says:

    I’m 33 and I knew all of the catchphrases. While I agree that the theme was missing a level of connection and I can’t say I really liked it, I disagree with the notion that “if it was before my time, I shouldn’t be expected to know it.” That strikes me as stubbornly incurious and frankly a little narcissistic.

    • Flinty Steve says:

      “if it was before my time, I shouldn’t be expected to know it” is not an accurate characterization of what the review says.

  6. marciem says:

    I know this is the wrong place for commenting on Sunday’s LAT, but the review wasn’t up last I looked yesterday afternoon…

    I have to voice an objection to 34d clued as “Privilege” and answered as “Right”.

    Um, no, at least not when I was learning the difference.

    Just had to say that. Gave me a bad taste over an otherwise pretty ok puzzle.

    • Martin says:

      I think that while not all rights are privileges, all privileges are rights. By the “clue-by-example” prohibition, the clue should have been “Privilege, for example.” (PRIVILEGE could be clued as “Right,” which might have bothered you but would be okay for me because it doesn’t imply that all rights are privileges.)

      I’d have been fine with something like, “Privilege, say.” Will Shortz tends to be a stickler for this rule, but some editors not so much.

      • David L says:

        I had the same objection as Marcie, and I don’t believe that “all privileges are rights.” Is White privilege a right, for example?

        Privilege, in my book, generally means an entitlement of some sort, which may or may be legally or morally justified.

        • Gary R says:

          The term “privilege” has become freighted in recent years, but privilege/right works fine in terms of dictionary definitions.

        • Martin says:

          The issue with White privilege is that it’s a bogus privilege, so it’s a bogus right. But by definition, a privilege is a right due to a position. Just because you claim a privilege doesn’t make it so.

          • David L says:

            Perhaps there’s a US/UK difference here. The definition at Cambridge agrees largely with mine, and would include White privilege as a specific example.

Comments are closed.