This week’s Fireball puzzle is a contest. We’ll post a review after the contest deadline.
Morton J. Mendelson’s Wall Street Journal crossword, “Backflips” — Jim P’s review
Pretty sure I’ve seen this type of theme before in which the final word is flipped around to create crossword wackiness.
- 17a [Discussion about watching with like colors?] LAUNDRY GAB. I suppose.
- 26a [Bit of scotch after being canned?] FIRING NIP. Yesterday “nip” meant “steal.” Today, it’s a “bit of scotch.”
- 48a [Siesta on a very sunny beach without sunscreen?] FRYING NAP. Okay, I can see this one.
- 62a [Effect of age and gravity on various body parts?] NATURAL SAG. This one is good; it makes sense and doesn’t feel forced like the others.
- 10d [What it takes to swear like a sailor?] GROSS YAP. Meh. I’m not even sure what it means to have a GROSS YAP. Plus, to me, Yap is a Micronesian island 500 miles southwest of Guam. (But I’m sure I’m in the minority on that one.)
- 38d [Spirit of spicy cuisine?] CHILI GOD. I kinda like this one, too. Although a clue that alluded to a chili cook-off might have been more engaging: [What some cook-off contestants pray to?], perhaps.
I like the wordplay, but none of these gave me a chuckle. Most of them just sounded awkward. And I would have found it more interesting if the flipped words were longer (five or six letters each, say). Still, some wordplay is (usually) better than no wordplay at all.
Since two of the themers are in the Down direction, there isn’t much space for flashy fill. CRAISINS is the best of the lot followed by SCISSORS and GO FLAT although I’m not sure about the clue for the latter. I would argue that [What helium balloons inevitably do] is a good clue for DEFLATE whereas an open can of soda would eventually GO FLAT.
I could do without LOCI clued as [Spots], OSSO [Bone, in Bologna], and DYADS [Doublets], but it’s Thursday, so we should expect more challenging vocabulary. I’M A COP [Friday’s introduction] is a very dated reference to Dragnet. And then there are the usual suspects: IS TO, DAY O, ONE A, A PAR, UNUM, UNA, ENOS, ETONS. Altogether, and with little ZING in the long fill and theme, I got a lackluster feeling.
In the end I’ll mark this one down around 3.25 stars. I like the fact that there’s wordplay going on, but I’d like to see it with a little more oomph.
Alex Eaton-Salners’ New York Times crossword—Ben’s review
This week’s Thursday NYT theme is a little more tricky to write about – there’s circled letters throughout the grid, but none of them are really theme entries. There are only 3 of those:
- 17D: One that becomes a 51-Across — CATERPILLAR
- 51A: Where a 17D becomes a 23A — CHRYSALIS
- 23A: Image formed by connecting this puzzle’s circled letters from A to N and then back to A — BUTTERFLY
Once you get the grid filled in on the app, it takes over and starts to animate the process of connecting the letters for you, resulting in the image shown at the left. It’s a much better job of connecting the letters than I would have done in MS Paint.
On the whole, it’s a little underwhelming for the Thursday puzzle theme – it’s a nice demo of what the NYT app can do, and a nice welcome to spring finally being here, but as an entire experience it left me a little underwhelmed.
Notes!
- The across fill doesn’t have anything OF NOTE that jumps out to me this week, but I liked the longer downs in this grid – GAMEBOY, GOSPELS, US STEEL, and EASED IN
- Michelle YEOH is great in Crazy Rich Asians.
Erik Agard’s Universal Crossword, “Tearing Open”—Jim Q’s write-up
Such a sad puzzle.
THEME: Phrases that begin with a synonym for “tearing up”
THEME ANSWERS:
- 19A [“Life in Motion: An Unlikely Ballerina” autobiographer] MISTY COPELAND.
- 34A [Alarmist’s activity] CRYING WOLF.
- 40A [Taking to task] BAWLING OUT.
- 56A [Its leaves reach to the ground] WEEPING WILLOW.
A breezy puzzle with a simple concept and a clean grid. BAWLING OUT is a new term for me, which I appreciate. BRIDE TO BE and POWER WALK make for excellent fill entries.
Happy to see NITPICK after recently learning what an actual NIT was last week .
If I were to NITPICK, I’d say that CRYING, BAWLING, and WEEPING are verbs (as well as “Tearing” in the title) and MISTY is an adjective. But they all work in the sentence “He/She is _______.” So who cares.
It’s also strange to call CRYING WOLF an “activity” imo.
Thanks, e.a. Fun as always.
3.5 stars.
Brendan Emmett Quigley’s website crossword, “Round Trips”—Andy’s review
I thought I’d try something a little different this week. As many of you know, I do a fair amount of my solving using only the down clues for an added challenge. I thought I’d try that with the BEQ puzzle this week and see how things went.
Overall, the solve went fairly smoothly! I’ll talk about some of my difficulties below, but first let’s talk about the theme. Obviously, I didn’t see the theme clues while solving, but it was fairly evident that BEQ has taken phrases ending in world capitals and reversed the capitals. Let’s have a look and see how he justified that in the clues, shall we?
- 18a, JACK NODNOL [“White Fang” author]. Jack London.
- 26a, FEEL THE NREB [2016/2020 political slogan]. Feel the Bern.
- 39a, PLASTER OF SIRAP [Cast material]. Plaster of Paris.
- 52a, CHICKEN VEIK [Poultry dish made with garlic butter]. Chicken Kiev.
- 64a, WHEN IN EMOR [Conformist’s phrase]. “When in Rome…”.
Not what I was expecting! The title of the puzzle, “Round Trips,” does all the work here: the places you could take a trip have been turned around.
My general constructing philosophy is very permissive of proper names so long as they’re crossed by familiar words. Of course, when you’re solving downs-only, you don’t have the luxury of looking at those crossing clues. So, entries like TK RYAN [“Tumbleweeds” cartoonist] or TOM ARAYA [Slayer’s lead singer] or even WES clued as [Rapper Sheck] become that much more difficult. Thankfully, I am familiar with the work of Sheck Wes and have at least seen Tom Araya’s name before, but solving this puzzle downs-only would be exponentially more difficult without that knowledge.
As you can see in the grid image, I had an error at 51d. The clue there is [Turns the other way]. It turns out there are two words ending in -VERTS that work for the clue: AVERTS, the correct answer, and EVERTS, which was the first thing I thought of. Both happen to make words going across (PASTA versus PASTE), so I never spotted the error.
The cluing (both across and down) was fairly straightforward in this one, probably because the theme was challenging. The only “?” clue in this one, which I really liked, was 62d, BAR [Old fashioned room?].
If you enjoyed that downs-only analysis of the puzzle, you can watch Joon and I occasionally (~once every two weeks) co-solve some challenging themeless puzzles together on his Twitch channel.
Until next week!
Roland Huget’s LA Times – Gareth’s summary
I’ve said it before. This type of theme always feels like a cop out. Oh well, Rene Auberjonois hopefully found the shout-out… SHAPESHIFTERS is the central revealer; anagramming shape like that only yields PHASE and HEAPS to build words from, however. So the letters are instead hidden somewhere in the entries, lessening the impact.
Here, we get a mix of the two, with the last entry being solely in the second part, and the other spanning the two-part phrases. I guess the apt of FINALPHASE as the last entry was too good to pass up, despite the sudden change in the theme’s pattern. Of the other entries, [Knot used to take up slack], SHEEPSHANK may be tough for many of us, barring former scouts and mariners, of course.
The puzzle was pretty low on contrived and awkward fill. A few difficult entries like MHO aren’t irksome if they’re spaced out. We also get GAMERRAGE and NOTCOOL in the longer fill, giving the puzzle a pep injection.
3 Stars
Gareth
Agree about the NYT puzzle. Fairly mundane for a Thursday. The NYT app needs work, though. It still doesn’t sync up the puzzles properly to my devices.
I rolled my eyes at OVOIDAL in the NW and almost stopped solving when I realized it was a picture puzzle. Not fun.
Me too, and at PINKOES, and several other scattered entries…
It’s only a three letter answer, but I appreciate the NYT’s clue for 31d in print way more than what appears online/in the app: ___✔ (traveler’s convenience) versus Air traveler’s convenience, informally. I can’t recall ever hearing it referred to simply as PRE. Perhaps it is written shorthand?
NYT – I like how CATERPILLAR forms the head, thorax, and abdomen of the grid art butterfly. As I solved, I felt sure Alex intended this central feature. When I read his constructor notes, he mentions that he shaded this gray in his submission. I found the puzzle to be a beautiful representation of metamorphosis, quite “whelming” in my opinion.
BEQ: 25D clue and answer don’t match. Carat is mass of gemstones; karat is purity of gold.
Yep, common error. Common enough that M-W has an entry for carat, =variant of karat. Which probably means it’s not wrong wrong, although we purists don’t like it.
Ever wonder why pure gold is 24-karat? Seems like an odd standard. It’s because a roman gold coin, the solidus, equalled the value of 24 siliquae, a smaller silver coin.
Siliqua was the name for a carob seed, which is of uniform enough weight to have been used as a standard measure. In Greek it was keration; in Arabic, qirat; in Italian, cerato; in Middle French, carat. Karat was the German spelling. Originally, in Middle English, a carat of gold became “a siliqua’s worth of gold in a solidus.” Eventually the German spelling was used to distinguish it from the carob seed’s weight (about 200 milligrams) of a gemstone. The 24-carat variant is just the old usage hanging on.
Hello! I am a big fan of your site and use it as my go-to reference when my brain and persistence fails, so thank you. Maybe I missed class on the day this was covered, but I do not know the meaning of the colored or highlighted answers in your solved puzzles. Can you please enlighten me? Thanks.
On behalf of the other Fiendsters, thanks!
I think you’re referring to the images of the solved grids, right? When we take a screenshot of a solved grid, the cursor has to be somewhere highlighting one of the entries. Usually, in my posts, I try to leave the cursor on the revealer if there is one. If there isn’t one, I highlight one of the theme entries. And if it’s a themeless puzzle, I would just put the cursor on one of the more interesting entries (or one of the most problematic).
But that’s just me. Sometimes we’re blogging in a hurry and just grab a screenshot of the grid regardless of where the cursor is. So it might just be a random entry that’s highlighted. Bottom line, don’t put too much stock in what’s highlighted in the grid.
Thanks for the question!